Filter opinions
Ben King
- Kind of player
- Rating
4 /5
- Date 15-04-26
Well worth it for the money. Don’t be put off by the drive in.
You have to be pretty straight off of the tee, as there are a lot of OBs, but the front 9 isn’t long, so irons are the clever play. The back 9 is long!
Greens were really good and true. Fairways weren’t bare, the bunkers filled and clean. Range was a bit tired but fine
The only real issue we had, was that it took us over 5.5 hours to complete a round!!! This is partly due to it being a Saturday, but Marshall’s speeding the slow players up would be a good addition. I think the slow play may be due to the fact that the cost of a round is cheap, so there are a lot of hackers.
Worth it for the money though. Better than Mar menor, Campoamor and Altaona/Mosa
John Ratajczak
- Kind of player
- Rating
3 /5
- Date 24-09-25
The front 9 was in good condition, back 9 fairways were a little patchy.
Steve
- Kind of player
- Rating
4.25 /5
- Date 23-06-25
Greens were fantastic
Russell Jenkins
- Kind of player
- Rating
3 /5
- Date 06-04-25
A decent course that is a touch cheaper than some. For that reason alone it is worth putting on your list to play. Facilities limited.
Andrew Hall
- Kind of player
- Rating
3.75 /5
- Date 29-03-25
Front 9 are very very good, the newer back 9 are ok, but fairways are not great. Good value golf though.
Steve
- Kind of player
- Rating
3.25 /5
- Date 14-03-25
Felt a long course. Back 9 felt more challenging with water hazard / gullies running alongside fairways to consume wayward shots. Course is on arid flat lands. Fairways ok and greens were surprisingly good.
Jyrki Friman
- Kind of player
- Rating
3.5 /5
- Date 25-04-24
Second time but not last.